The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Evaluate tools and techniques for architectural design
|
|
Apply principles of architectural design within the life cycle of application software Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop a process to apply appropriate tools and techniques for architectural design of end-to-end solutions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate and select appropriate analysis and selection techniques to develop a partition between discipline technologies and derive discipline-specific requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse design options for optimal solutions
|
|
Critically analyse business options to support architectural design trade-offs for an optimal design solution Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop alternative architectural designs traceable to the requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate a range of architectural solutions and justify selection of the optimum solution Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop interface requirements for effective solutions across multiple domains
|
|
Evaluate system element interfaces and sources of complexity for interface management of the system across multiple domains Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop a process and appropriate techniques to be adopted for the interface management of system elements for end-to-end architectural solutions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce a control process for system element interfaces of the management system Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaise and arbitrate between stakeholders where there are conflicts in the definition of interfaces Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage end-to-end systems integration
|
|
Evaluate suitability of system integration, verification and validation plans for end-to-end architectural solutions across multiple domains Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop systems integration, verification and validation plans for complex systems to ensure a viable integration process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage system integration plan and diagnose complex faults Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document fault conditions, report to appropriate person and follow up corrective actions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare evidence for customer acceptance and certification of the system integration management plan Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan and manage a transition to operational activity for the end-to-end solution Completed |
Evidence:
|
Incorporate components of an architecture from a third party
|
|
Negotiate with vendor for acceptable vendor agreements and agreed roles and responsibilities of each party Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage vendor within a clearly defined process for dealing with defects and scope changes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan beyond delivery of specific elements and establish requirements for ongoing maintenance and support from vendor Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage requirements for the architecture solution
|
|
Negotiate minimum component costs with vendors and analyse vendor component costs as part of assessment for the appropriateness of vendor’s quote Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage vendor selection process to provide high-quality solutions within appropriate costings Completed |
Evidence:
|